Why Evolution and Religion Can Coexist

Jason So argons 1-1 Science and godliness Can Coexist Re pot 2 For centuries attainment and apparitional belief fork over been competing with distri preciselyively some former(a) to reign supreme eeryplace the other. It makes superstar wonder honorable wherefore it has come to this. After al unitedly arent they in some(prenominal) aspects instead similar? Con steadr the following the theory of evolution, the large-minded volcanic eruption theory, and the Copenhagen interpretation theory al unitedly fix atomic number 53 constant term, theory. Why? completely of them havent been proven yet as they are still mere theories. immediately shifting everyplace to godliness, when reading a holy book, one finds no facts or substantial express of how things exist as they do to twenty-four hour period. faith, as much of acquaintance, is merely reportd on beliefs. Yet billions choose to every gestate in a higher creation or eliminate the idea of a god altogether. No affair which side is square(a) or false, one true statement that can be do is that one could not exist without the other. Religion is for spiritual healing and belief whereas, information is, in most cases, the actual avatar of our beliefs.Science and worship can coexist because arguably the spectacularest mind of them all give tongue to so, religions moral philosophy and determine uses lore to the benefit of all mankind, and possibly idol himself employ learning to hit all that we see. Firstly, if indisputably the greatest scientist in the taradiddle of mankind, Albert wizard the person who set the base for modern science as we contend it today found no line of work in believing in both(prenominal) science and religion, then why should we?Einstein did not believe in a personal perfection, a god who cares for us or intervenes in the lives of people, provided in one that maintained and created the harmony of the world a god nonetheless. That may await quite odd as galore(postnominal) beliefs render science and religion incompatible. Yet, m each scientists, correspond to surveys, arrange that there is no conflict between their faith and their work. Joel Primack, a professor from the University of California, Santa Cruz, co- fixed the cold dark matter theory that seeks to explain the formation and construction of the populace.He also believes in deity and that God and science can exist in harmony. He claims that in the last a couple of(prenominal) geezerhood astronomy has come together so that were now able to ramify a coherent reputation of how the universe began, Primack said. This story does not contradict God, moreover instead enlarges the idea of God. (National Geographic intelligence activity website) This is one example of how clearly science and religion go hand in hand. Secondly, most religions in this world pick up three basic steps in world able to enter the without end life that most of them offer keep one another, love your neighbour and be kind to all.Not a bad disposition on which to base a unit religion on. In fact it sounds quite noble. Think close it, many lives are based on the above lean referable to a strict enforcing of religion from family or a confederation, and if even a small portion of those people climb up to be doctors and scientists, we can say with ease that the conviction to come of our technological advancements is fulgid and it is in the right hands. After analyzing the nurture of these theoretical people, we can come to a conclusion that religion helped a great deal in steering their science-filled future in the right direction.It exit be foolish on our part to disclaim religion just because weve advanced in science and engineering. As our knowledge increases, we must move nearer to the roots of our religion, and this is the peak when both religion and science will be working together for the break upment of mankind. For example, euthanasia, t he killing of a human beingness to relieve pain and suffering (mercy-killing), is wide considered unethical. This mercy-killing is just a euphemism for felo-de-se. The priming coat why we dont say suicide is because it is usually frowned upon by society, yet when someone is on a hospital complete and doesnt want to live anymore, its justified.People say suicide and mercy-killing are different, hardly they both lead to the same progeny the killing of a human being because the person no longer has a desire to live. By definition, this is indeed suicide because it is taking a life international since they no longer find appreciate for it, and yet it is being done throughout the world in public hospitals. straight off a doctor with a well behaved moral and ethical background due to religion or a community with strong values would not consent to the pressures of this daily occurrence. And arent doctors supposed to film life into this world and help puzzle it when outside forces threaten it?Moreover, it is daunting to theorise that someone can just evoke the plug on another being just because the former wants to die. Science and technology can be a grace of God in the hands of wise men, temporary hookup it can be deadly in the hands of others, and if we are wiser and nearer to our religious roots we can enjoy our lives better knowing that religions morals and values will use science to the benefit of all mankind. Thirdly, possibly one of the most controversial and heated theories of all is the one that concerns the very place in which we live in, the grown bang theory.According to the bombastic bang theory, space, time, and all matter close to us was created by the grandest explosion ever to occur in our universe. When consulting religious persons about this theory they would whole heartedly disagree with it. treat for granted they were Catholics, they would immediately refer to the Bible and deferred payment that God created the world, the vegetation, animals, and humans within it. Now level headed persons who are on incomplete side of the science-religion debate would argue that, why cant both the big bang theory and the biblical story of God be true?They would reason that mayhap God used this order of creation for His own purpose, to create a world that is habitable by life. formerly again the religious would disagree, saying that according to the book of Genesis, God created Earth in seven days, and according to the big bang theory the earth took billions of years to develop in order to exhibit any traces of human life. Seven days compared to billions of years is quite a difference, yet when examining the record of God in the Bible, the religious cannot take the seven day period so literally.Perhaps it did take God seven days to create the earth, but maybe God was on a different time scale. One day for us is 20 four hours, but one day for God could have been thousands, millions, or billions of years. Furtherm ore, perhaps these seven days werent consecutive. They could have been spanned out over billions of years and just the major days on which God created his most praised wonders are mentioned. In rundown to the creation process of the earth, God could have used the scientific methods of photosynthesis, natural selection, and unnumberable others to create this world.Not only can we admit science and religion closer together than ever by this new position, but we can say that one by all odds assisted in the process of the other and that the relationship between science and religion is strong. Ultimately, one can see that science and religion can coexist, because many of our brightest minds are an example of this, science can be used for worthy causes due to religions ethics, and with a new perspective it can be debated that God himself used science for his own creation purposes. No one is forced to sway either way of the debate and everyone is elcomed to stay neutral, nonetheless, one cannot obliviously deny one and praise the other with an un-open mind. We can choose to believe one, but we shouldnt reject the other altogether. All we should ask of ourselves is not to ignore the wardrobe questions which alter our views on religion or science, but to expand our tunnel vision and wander into unfamiliar territories to grasp a better understanding of both therefore closing the gap between science and religion so that one day the feud between the two may rest peacefully in the minds of all.